Salt Ships Case

Justyna Wubs-Mrozewicz

Visualization of the salt ships case

Based on the research published in:

Justyna Wubs-Mrozewicz and Alain Wijffels, “Diplomacy and Advocacy. The case of the King of Denmark v. Dutch Skippers before the Danzig City Council (1564–1567)” Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d’Histoire Du Droit/The Legal History Review 84, no. 1–2 (2016): 1–53.

Justyna Wubs-Mrozewicz, “Neutrality before Grotius: A City, a State and Seven Salt Ships in the Baltic (1564-1567),” Journal of Early Modern History 22, no. 6 (2018): 446–474.

Justyna Wubs-Mrozewicz, “Witnessing the Sea: Testimonials of Seamen in the ‘Seven Salt Ships’ Case (1564–1567) as Sources for Maritime, Social, and Legal History,” International Journal of Maritime History 30, no. 4 (2018): 701–723.

Latest Blog Posts

History in conflict webinar: introducing the modern edition

Justyna Wubs-Mrozewicz

Attention! We’re talking about history here, and it’s important. This might be the summary of the online webinar on #historyinconflict held on June, 25th (2022), where we addressed the role of bringing up historical narratives in conflicts in the 19th-21st centuries. It was the third instalment in a series of webinars, after meetings on medieval and early modern conflicts. Now our attention has turned to modern conflicts: for instance, WWII in the Netherlands, border struggles in South America from the 19th century onwards, tensions related to religious reforms in India in the 20th century, and the perceptions of the past in post-WWII Poland or Vietnam. The insights we gained from the fascinating papers that were presented, and the discussions that followed, show that references to the past have clearly gained a foothold as powerful and versatile tools. And that they grab our attention and often create controversy.

Historians like Margaret Macmillan and Timothy Snyder have rightly pointed out that history has been used, abused and re-used many times over, sometimes in a cyclical fashion. The editors of the newly minted Journal of Applied History underline that our current engagement with the past – especially during conflicts – is a topic that in fact more than merits our attention:  ‘The accumulation of crises in the new millennium, as well as the omnipresence of the instrumentalisation—and abuse—of history and historical claims in a highly polarised political climate may have increased public awareness of the value of historical thinking for the present, but these developments have also made such awareness more urgent.’ A crucial issue here is the role of professional historians: what part have they played in conflicts in the 20th century, and what role are they playing or should they play now? Is debunking myths enough, or should the spokespeople of the past be more activist or creative? [....]

Continue reading